Whaleshares Logo

Rule of Law: How the Supreme Court Doomed the US and the West

redpillPosted for redpill Pod Members to comment on, 3 years ago7 min read

Good summary of the recent supreme court ruling by Martin Armstrong, and validation of the truth that in reality, you have no rights whatsoever, certainly not under "The Constitution", except as the court, in its sole discretion decides to consider, for those whom it chooses to favor...

The Supreme Court avoided ruling claiming Texas had no standing which is completely false. Not giving a decision, either way, will propel civil unrest as each side claims they are right. Already people in Texas are talking about secession might be the answer for pro-Trump states. This time, we are approaching the break up of the United States and it may indeed be the only solution. No side has the right to oppress the other and the Supreme Court will NOT defend the people or the Constitution. The rule of law was the foundation of civilization, and refusing to comply with that duty condemns the nation to oblivion.

The Supreme Court has NO DISCRETION whatsoever to deny the petition and I do not say that as being supportive of the action.

Biden got more votes in each of these swing states than Hillary or Obama which was NOT the case in any other state. This is indicative of fraud and it should have been addressed yes or no. This election was STOLEN not by Biden, but by an international agenda which has taken over the entire West and they needed Trump removed.

The Judiciary Act of 1925 held that the Supreme Court would have the discretion to select what it wants to hear in direct violation of the Constitution, which has NEVER been addressed.

The only court required by the Constitution is the Supreme Court and every Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States are required to take two oaths before they may execute the duties of their appointed office – (1) the Constitutional Oath to defend it and (2) the Judicial Oath.

Therefore, anyone can see on its face that the Judiciary Act of 1925 is unconstitutional for it violates their oath to defend the constitution when they have the discretion to not hear cases.

This means that those in power do not have to obey any law, even the Constitution. The Supreme Court also said, “it is obvious that discretion does not exist where there is no power to act except in one way. When judges and politicians claim discretion, they claim to be ABOVE the law of men.”

Obviously, the majority of the court simply did not want to get into this election dispute. Like Dread Scott, which tried to avoid the issue of slavery by ruling that blacks had no rights under the Constitution to avoid ruling which led to the Civil War, the Supreme Court has once again condemned the country to Civil War as the Democrats try to implement the Agenda 2030, they will unleash violence no different than the Russian revolution.

There is no doubt that they had an argument and that it fell squarely within the Original Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. Alito and Thomas recognized that. The fact that the other 7 justices denied cert merely shows they did not want to rule on this matter which is an exercise of discretion that has now doomed the USA to continuing violence. In doing so, they have violated the civil right of the entire nation and condemned the world to the ruthless tyranny coming out of the World Economic Forum. Based upon information and belief, this entire “Build Back Better” movement has been designed by the marketing firm Edelman which already appears to be pushing this new world order and is also in a partnership with the World Economic Forum.

In 1976, an Eastern District Court in New York heard a case, Donohue v. Board of Elections of State of NY, 435 F. Supp. 957 (E.D.N.Y. 1976), where it was alleged that voter fraud in several urban locations took place not unlike what we see right now. In that decision, the court maintained that federal courts had a role to play in ensuring free and fair presidential elections. It held: “It is difficult to imagine a more damaging blow to public confidence in the electoral process than the election of a President whose margin of victory was provided by fraudulent registration or voting, ballot-stuffing or other illegal means.”

Link: How the Supreme Court Doomed the US and the West (Armstrong Economics)

As for the end result of all this on one's "constitutional rights", well, try, just try to prove you have any, if you can get a court to even consider your case, at their own discretion...


Atilis Gym co-owner Ian Smith said in video posted on Instagram that the only time New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy will be able to shut his gym’s doors is when he’s dead.

“We have been open against unconstitutional shut down orders since May,” he said in the description. “Not once have we flinched, and the petty tyrant of New Jersey governor Murphy has tried everything he could possibly think of to ruin us. Over seven months later we will open our doors every single day. No government official will ever tell me that I am not able to provide for my family. I do not answer to public servants – no matter what threats or punishments they impose. I am a free man. I do not ask for permission. I do not ask for forgiveness. You work for us. The only way you’ll ever close these doors is when you close my casket.”

Link: Defiant NJ Gym Owner to Murphy: ‘The Only Way You’ll Ever Close These Doors Is When You Close My Casket’ (Townhall)

Smith says the gym has had more than 80,000 visits without any cases of coronavirus being linked back to the facility, yet Governor of Grand Tyranny Murphy had their business license stripped, and their doors locked and barricaded. They've been arrested, and they’ve been fined more than $1 million and racked up over 60 citations for their "defiance" of those who are supposed to work for "we the people".

Then there's the case of Daniel Presti and the destruction of his bar and livelihood, "Mac’s Public House" in Staten Island, NYC, who dared stand up against Governor and Mayor of Grand Tyrannical Larceny Cuomo and DeBlasio, in light of the over 110,000 restaurants that have closed permanently or long-term across the country as the industry grapples with the devastating impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, who then even went so far as to try and frame Presti for daring to disobey his farm masters...

Danny Presti, co-owner of Mac’s Public House, allegedly slammed his new Jeep into sheriff’s sergeant Kenneth Matos, fracturing both of his tibias, while fleeing an attempt to arrest him for illegally operating the rogue Grant City watering hole in defiance of COVID-19 restrictions around midnight Sunday, authorities and law-enforcement sources have said.

But Lou Gelormino, an attorney for Presti, challenged the description of Matos’ injuries in a press briefing held Monday outside the bar. “That’s an outright lie,” he said. “One of the deputies injured his ankle. Either he tore a ligament or something, we still don’t know the extent. “Saying that he broke his legs is an outrageous, outright lie, completely confirmed.”

Gelormino cited as proof the fact that Presti was released Sunday on his own recognizance, despite facing a litany of charges including a bail-eligible felony rap.

“If he ran over a sheriff’s deputy, they would’ve asked for a half a million dollars in bail,” said Gelormino.

Link: Lawyer says sheriff allegedly rammed by NYC bar owner’s SUV is lying about broken legs (NYPost)

Link: Restaurant Closings Top 110,000 With Industry in ‘Free Fall’ (Bloomberg)

Join our pod if you would like to help us source and share more content such as this!

Sign Up to join this conversation, or to start a topic of your own.
Your opinion is celebrated and welcomed, not banned or censored!